High Court dismisses £340m black‑cab claim, Uber wins bid
The judge ruled the lawsuits were filed beyond the six‑year limit, ending a challenge by thousands of drivers and two private‑hire firms.
News London evidence indexOpen analysis ▾
The central claim is attributed to a named body (Uber) and a judge, but relies on reporting from Reuters for specific figures.
Higher is stronger
The article clearly separates fact from comment and names the responsible body, but lacks quotes from affected parties.
Higher is stronger
The headline is a fair summary of the article's main point, without undue sensationalism.
Lower is better
The High Court has rejected a series of lawsuits that together demanded around £340 million from Uber. The action was brought by thousands of London black‑cab drivers and two private‑hire companies that argue Uber misled Transport for London when it obtained its licence in 2012.
Background to the claims
London poll shows 67% would vote to rejoin EU
YouGov surveyed 2,312 adults across England and Wales on 4‑5 October 2026, finding London support far above the Midlands, South and North.
The drivers, represented by RGL Management, filed the claims in 2024, alleging that Uber supplied false information to TfL during the licence application process. The drivers’ group claimed nearly £200 million in damages, while the private‑hire firms Kabbie and Iride, now closed, pursued about £140 million, as reported by the BBC.
Judge’s reasoning
Mr Justice Birt concluded that the claimants could have discovered the alleged deception before 2018, meaning the actions fell outside the six‑year limitation period for such claims. He therefore dismissed the cases without examining the substance of the allegations.
Report Urges UK to Rejoin EU Amid Global Threats
IPPR think tank suggests EU membership as a medium-term goal for Britain to enhance its influence.
Uber said it was pleased the court had thrown them out at the earliest opportunity.
Uber spokesperson, Uber
Uber, which denied any wrongdoing, welcomed the ruling, stating the decision prevents a protracted legal battle and allows the company to focus on its operations across London, including boroughs such as Barnet where many licensed black‑cab drivers work.
Implications for London drivers
The dismissal means that drivers in Barnet and elsewhere will not receive the compensation they sought. RGL Management expressed disappointment and indicated it is reviewing its options with legal counsel, but no further court action has been announced at this stage.
What happens next
The claimants have not confirmed whether they will appeal the decision. Uber also faces a separate tax dispute with HM Revenue and Customs, scheduled for hearing next week, which could have financial implications independent of the current case.
Questions this report answers
+Why were the black‑cab claims dismissed?
The High Court ruled the lawsuits were filed after the six‑year limitation period expired. The judge said the claimants could have identified the alleged misinformation before 2018, so the cases were time‑barred and dismissed without a merits review.
+How much money were the drivers seeking?
Around 13,000 black‑cab drivers pursued nearly £200 million in damages, while the two private‑hire firms claimed about £140 million, bringing the total demand to roughly £340 million, according to the BBC report.
+What does the ruling mean for black‑cab drivers in Barnet?
Barnet drivers will not receive the compensation they sought from Uber. The decision ends the current legal avenue for those claims, although the representatives said they are reviewing possible next steps with their legal team.
+Can the claimants appeal the decision?
The claimants have not announced an appeal, but RGL Management said it is considering its options. Any appeal would need to address the limitation period issue highlighted by Mr Justice Birt.
News London Desk
This article was written at the News London news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs News LondonCorrections
The London Ledger
A considered capital-wide edit delivered each morning.
More Coverage in Council & Politics