Kensington and Chelsea approves 24-hour gambling venue opposite Earl’s Court station
Silvertime Amusements secures licence despite 346 objections and a prior planning refusal
News London evidence indexOpen analysis ▾
Named council, councillor and legal counsel cited, but no documents or multiple outlets.
Higher is stronger
Provides impact context, quotes affected parties, specific figures, and next steps clearly.
Higher is stronger
Headline uses loaded phrasing, yet article remains fact‑based.
Lower is better
Residents of Earl’s Court will see a 24-hour gambling venue open opposite the Tube station after Kensington and Chelsea Council granted Silvertime Amusements a licence on 15 May 2025. The decision overrides a planning refusal issued in April 2025 for the same site, a former Lloyds bank at 177-179 Earl’s Court Road.
The council’s licensing committee approved the application despite 346 objections from the local community. Objections included concerns about increased gambling harm in an area already marked by high deprivation and inequality, as reported by MyLondon.
Brompton Cemetery open day returns with catacomb tours on 6 September
Guided walks through the Victorian cemetery and its underground catacombs will run every 30 minutes
Councillors and advocates warn of local impact
All three Earl’s Court ward councillors opposed the licence. Councillor Linda Wade, speaking to MyLondon, said the decision failed to account for vulnerable residents, including those in supported hostels and general housing with complex needs. She criticised the council for not consulting Public Health before the decision.
The impact of this application cannot be overstated. It is detrimental to the local area, it does not recognise the level of street livers who are vulnerable and the need to beg, it has targeted an area of deprivation in a borough with the highest level of inequalities.
Councillor Linda Wade, Earl’s Court ward
Waitrose secures Cricklewood Broadway site with Barnet Council sign-off
The 1,665 sq m store will open this autumn as part of a £1 billion national expansion by the John Lewis Partnership.
Human rights advocate Bianca Jagger also objected, stating that children in the area must be protected from harm. MyLondon reported her comments alongside those of local councillors.
Operator defends relocation plans
Silvertime Amusements, represented by legal counsel Andrew Woods, argued that the new venue would provide better facilities than its current site at 169 Earl’s Court Road. The company has operated there for a decade without reported issues, according to Woods, as reported by MyLondon.
The proposed venue would increase the number of gambling machines from 26 to 40. Silvertime must also employ a Security Industry Authority-trained door supervisor at all times if the venue opens. The operator is required to close its existing site before the new one can begin trading.
What happens next
Silvertime Amusements must now appeal the council’s planning refusal to proceed with the new venue. The outcome of that appeal will determine whether the licence can be used. The council has indicated it will consult Public Health in future licensing decisions, as reported by MyLondon.
Questions this report answers
+How many gambling machines will the new venue have?
The new venue would house 40 gambling machines, an increase from 26 at Silvertime Amusements’ current site. This change depends on the operator winning a planning appeal, as reported by MyLondon.
+What are the conditions for the new gambling venue?
Silvertime Amusements must close its existing venue at 169 Earl’s Court Road before opening the new one. It must also employ a trained door supervisor at all times, as required by Kensington and Chelsea Council.
+Why did the council approve the licence after refusing planning permission?
The council’s licensing committee granted the 24-hour licence separately from planning approval. Silvertime must now appeal the planning refusal to proceed, as the licence alone does not permit the venue to open.
+Who objected to the gambling venue and why?
346 residents, all three Earl’s Court ward councillors, and human rights advocate Bianca Jagger objected. They cited concerns about gambling harm in an area of high deprivation and the impact on vulnerable residents, as reported by MyLondon.
News London Desk
This article was written at the News London news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs News LondonCorrections
The London Ledger
A considered capital-wide edit delivered each morning.