Russell Brand sentenced, Jonathan Ross says he was unaware, Kate Garraway calls him brave
Southwark Crown Court handed a 10½‑year term to Brand while Ross defended his lack of knowledge on Good Morning Britain, prompting Garraway’s praise
News London evidence indexOpen analysis ▾
Includes named persons, Ross’s released statement, sentencing details and dates, giving solid evidence.
Higher is stronger
Provides quotes, context and specifics, but reads largely like a press release.
Higher is stronger
Headline and language are dramatic, yet the article largely repeats press‑release content.
Lower is better
Southwark Crown Court concluded a four‑week trial on 10 November 2026 with a guilty verdict for Russell Brand on charges of rape and sexual assault. The court imposed a custodial term of ten and a half years. The Standard reported the sentence and noted that the verdict followed a high‑profile investigation into the comedian’s past behaviour.
Ross’s denial of knowledge
Russell Brand found guilty of rape and sexual assault
Comedian convicted of one rape and three sexual assaults between 2004 and 2009 at Southwark Crown Court.
During a Good Morning Britain panel on 12 November, Jonathan Ross addressed the resurfaced footage of his 2004 British Comedy Awards routine that referenced David Walliams and teenage girls. The Standard recorded Ross saying he was “genuinely unaware of their conduct”. He added that he was “as horrified by the revelations about David Walliams and the crimes of Russell Brand as the rest of the nation”. Ross also explained that the joke about Walliams was supplied by the awards’ script team and that he would not have used it had he suspected a real‑world link.
“I think he’s rather brave for speaking out,” Garraway said.
Kate Garraway, TV presenter
Garraway’s defence of Ross
Russell Brand convicted, bail denied and sentencing set for Monday
Metropolitan Police says investigations into further rape allegations against the comedian remain active
Kate Garraway, appearing alongside Ross, described his comments as brave. The Standard quoted her as saying she could believe Ross did not know what was happening at the time of the 2007 Big Fat Quiz special. She also warned that the culture of “lads’ mags” and “laddy banter” that existed then was no longer acceptable. Garraway’s remarks were met with disagreement from panellist Ayesha Hazarika, who called the claim of ignorance “nonsense”.
Implications and next steps
The sentencing of Brand is final unless an appeal is lodged. No appeal has been announced as of the date of reporting. Ross’s admission of ignorance does not trigger any formal investigation, but media outlets may revisit past interviews for further scrutiny. Garraway’s praise may shape public perception of how industry figures address historic misconduct. Observers note that the case highlights the growing expectation for transparency in entertainment circles.
Questions this report answers
+How long was Russell Brand sentenced to prison?
Russell Brand received a custodial term of ten and a half years after being found guilty of rape and sexual assault at Southwark Crown Court. The sentence reflects the seriousness of the offences and will be served in a high‑security facility.
+What did Jonathan Ross say about his knowledge of the allegations?
Jonathan Ross told Good Morning Britain on 12 November 2026 that he was genuinely unaware of Russell Brand’s crimes and of David Walliams’s alleged misconduct. He said he would not have used the 2004 joke had he suspected any real‑world wrongdoing.
+How did Kate Garraway describe Jonathan Ross’s comments?
Kate Garraway said on the Good Morning Britain panel that she believed Ross was rather brave for speaking out about the two comedians. She added that the culture of the time was not acceptable today, reinforcing her support for his stance.
+Is there any indication of an appeal against Brand’s conviction?
As of the reporting date, no appeal has been announced by Russell Brand or his legal team. The conviction and sentence remain in force unless a formal appeal is lodged and subsequently heard by a higher court.
News London Desk
This article was written at the News London news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs News LondonCorrections
The London Ledger
A considered capital-wide edit delivered each morning.
More Coverage in Culture & Arts
Enfield residents can see six short films at Dugdale Arts Centre on 19 November
Southwark's Kirkaldy's Testing Works added to Heritage at Risk Register
