2/4
/World/ /5 min read

Supreme Court to hear Palestine Action ban appeal after 117 arrests

Westminster protest sees mass detentions under Terrorism Act ahead of legal challenge

News London evidence indexOpen analysis ▾
55/100Evidence
60/100Reporting
55/100Hype

No named sources on the record beyond officials and court statements

Higher is stronger

Limited right of reply beyond official statements

Higher is stronger

Headline overstates implications of legal review

Lower is better

ByNews London Desk
30 Jul 2026/London Edition/5 min read
ShareFacebookXWhatsApp
Supreme Court to hear Palestine Action ban appeal after 117 arrests

Westminster saw the largest single-day protest arrest operation in recent memory on 30 July, as 117 people were detained outside the Magistrates’ Court. The Metropolitan Police said the majority were arrested for expressing support for Palestine Action, a group proscribed under terrorism legislation in July 2025. Four others face charges of encouraging or assisting a criminal offence.

The arrests coincided with a legal milestone. The Supreme Court granted Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, permission to appeal the ban. The court’s decision, published on the same day, allows a challenge on the grounds that the Home Secretary misapplied her own policy. A separate bid to argue the ban breaches free speech rights was rejected.

Read Next in News London4 min read
London’s drought-hit capital sees first rain in weeks

London’s drought-hit capital sees first rain in weeks

Light showers bring less than 0.5mm per hour as hosepipe ban remains in place across the city

A ban upheld, then contested

The Home Office banned Palestine Action after a series of direct actions targeting Elbit Systems, an Israeli-owned defence firm with UK sites. Former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper acted on advice from police and security services, citing criminal damage exceeding £1 million. The High Court initially ruled the ban unlawful, but the Court of Appeal overturned that decision in June 2026.

Five senior judges concluded the proscription was lawful, setting a precedent for how terrorism legislation can be applied to protest groups. The Supreme Court will now examine whether Cooper followed correct procedure. A hearing is scheduled between October and December, with the case expedited due to its national significance.

Related Borough Coverage3 min read
Manchester United to field new midfielder Tielemans in Stockholm friendly

Manchester United to field new midfielder Tielemans in Stockholm friendly

Belgian summer signing set for debut against Atlético Madrid on 1 August 2026

This unprecedented attack on free speech and the right to protest in this country is already having a chilling effect at a time when speaking out about Israel’s crimes could not be more urgent.

Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action

Protests and prosecutions

The 30 July protest, organised by Defend Our Juries, was billed as a “Graduation Day” for 1,579 people facing charges under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act. Participants took turns declaring support for Palestine Action from a stage. Among those arrested was Sir Jonathan Porritt, former director of Friends of the Earth and long-time adviser to King Charles.

The Metropolitan Police had warned that expressing support for a proscribed organisation would lead to arrest. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Andy Valentine said the law was clear and that other avenues existed to voice opinions on Gaza without criminality. Defend Our Juries disputed this, calling the arrests an assault on democracy and civil liberties.

2,000+protesters facing potential trial for declaring support for Palestine ActionCases stem from mass vigils in Parliament Square and other demonstrations

What happens next

The Supreme Court’s ruling will determine whether the ban stands. If Ammori’s appeal succeeds, Palestine Action could be removed from the list of proscribed organisations. If it fails, the group may take the case to the European Court of Human Rights.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the government would robustly defend the ban. She stated the Court of Appeal found Palestine Action had carried out acts of terrorism and promoted violence. The Home Office maintains the ban does not restrict lawful protest in support of Palestine.

For the 2,000 people facing trial, the outcome remains uncertain. Westminster Magistrates’ Court had listed their cases in error, but many defendants said they felt compelled to attend. The Met confirmed the hearings were adjourned, though no new dates have been set.

News London Desk

This article was written at the News London news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.

How stories are produced and scoredWho runs News LondonCorrections

Daily edition

The London Ledger

A considered capital-wide edit delivered each morning.

More Coverage in World

London’s drought-hit capital sees first rain in weeks
London

London’s drought-hit capital sees first rain in weeks

4 min read
Manchester United to field new midfielder Tielemans in Stockholm friendly

Manchester United to field new midfielder Tielemans in Stockholm friendly

3 min read
London Fire Brigade sends crews to Suffolk wildfire near Sizewell

London Fire Brigade sends crews to Suffolk wildfire near Sizewell

4 min read
Taika Waititi on Sam Neill: death is not ‘the end of things’

Taika Waititi on Sam Neill: death is not ‘the end of things’

4 min read

Who else reported this

Our article above is written from the facts in these reports. Read the originals — every one is linked.

Capital conditions

Weather in central London

Loading live conditions…

Westminster magistrates court hears 117 arrests in Palestine Action appeal | News London